Which is Better – Crystalline or Thin-film Module?

When you want to purchase a solar panel, very often you are stuck with the question of which type of panels to choose from. The various factors in making this decision ranges from the efficiency, cost, reliability and longevity of the solar panel type.

Let us start this discussion by categorising the types of solar cells.

Types of Solar PanelsNow, let us compare crystalline and thin-film technologies by tabulating their pros and cons:

Crystalline Thin-film

  • High efficiencies ranging from 12-20%
  • Proved to be highly reliable
  • Ease of fabrication
  • Environment-friendliness of silicon
  • Proven technology

  • Could cost slightly less than crystalline panels, per KW
  • Better performance at hotter temperatures, overall better temperature coefficient compared to crystalline panels
  • More visually pleasing and hence preferred by architects when aesthetics are a priority
  • These cells are superior to silicon due to their band gap property as a result of which they absorb a wider range of sunlight wavelength

  • Lower performance at high temperatures
  • Flexibility of crystalline silicon solar panels is limited compared to that for thin film solar panels; as a result, might be difficult to use these types of panels on non-standard structures and product surfaces.



  • Lower efficiency compared to crystalline silicon solar panels
  • Relatively new technology and thus does not have considerable history of long performance. Thus, their longevity is not fully proven in real life conditions.
  • Need more roof space to produce same output as crystalline panels, hence offsetting the low cost advantage
  • Pollution concerns from CdTe and CIGS technologies that use Cadmium


The question of which panel is better is a bit difficult to summarise as the efficiency and cost of panels varies with respect to the manufacturer, location and other factors. But as a general consensus the following can be summarised while deciding on the best solar panel:

  • Monocrystalline panels are currently the most efficient types of solar panels but polysilicon panels dominate the market with around 70% of crystalline panel market share.
  • Monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels have similar advantages but monocrystalline panel are slightly more space-efficient. So, if you decide to choose a solar panel with a rated capacity of 200 watts, monocrystalline panels save space. Thus, thin film panels are unsuitable for residential installations due to their space inefficiency and can only be profitably installed on a commercial scale. Hence, when space is a concern it is better to use crystalline panels.
  • Although, traditionally crystalline silicon cells are considered to have better efficiencies, thin-film cells are catching up at a fast pace. First Solar, a US-based solar PV manufacturer, has been a pioneer in developing thin-film technology and has challenged polycrystalline cell efficiencies. In fact, through its thin-film revolution, it has become the largest and most profitable solar company.

So, in a changing market scenario, it is to be seen how the market for different solar technologies changes in the future. And hence the decision to choose the best panel type depends on the local market scenario and the availability of solar installers for a particular solar technology which differs from location-to-location.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply https://www.solarmango.com/mamba-dating/

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

India Renewable Energy Expert